Gisele vs King Kong

Comments

Yup. With you there. Sometimes these things can be over-thought.

i think the sad fact is that for most people, life in africa (or asia, or even europe that's not london or paris or rome) is just an abstract concept and just doesn't figure in any signficicant way into anyone's life (or so they believe). especially africa.

i guess i can see the "playing" with the image of black man as dangerous and white woman as needing protection (the entire justification for much of the jim crow leglislation), but the bigger concern i have is how irony is totally lost on much of the public. you can't be ironic without offending someone.

that said, i haven't even seen the cover...

anyway vogue is a piece of crap.

[this is good]
Haha! This is classic GinBaby. I love it.

True, true. I mean, even those of us who read a lot of international news and try to stay abreast of events find Africa incomprehensible in so many ways. I mean, wow. Wow, damn. Frequently, that's all I can think when I read about Africa. Once in a while I think that I suck so bad every time I bitch about being poor.

Anyway, I guess irony was lost on me in this case, too, because I didn't actually think of it as an ironic thing, but I can see your point. I just didn't make the association with King Kong at all, not even in an ironic way.

Vogue is a piece of crap, but once in a while I read it so that I can see what the wealthy and frivolous are up to (I was interested to read, for example, that a couple of summers ago, our toenails were supposed to be without colored polish--how exotic!--thus placing enormous emphasis on having an absolutely perfect pedicure--how very, um, upper class) and/or what Marc Jacobs is up to. But the Vogue look doesn't interest me all that much. I like couture, I think it can be an interesting reflection and commentary on society and our changing mores and economic realities and all of that, but Vogue is often so repetitive and even for fashion it often looks unrealistic.

[this is good]
Woah. You know that usually I'm up for a good debate about media stereotypes but I'm with you on this one. Can't the people criticising this cover see that there's a bit of hypocrisy in accusing the magazine of racism while they are automatically seeing the black man as a gorilla!? If he'd been climbing the Empire State Building then yeah, maybe there'd be a charge worth answering. But he's got a basketball, not a ruddy great big building. And just because he looks angry and he's got a girl in his arms I think it's pretty offensive to suddenly see him as King Kong. While I personally think there is a lot of subliminal racism and sexism in the media I don't see this as an example of it.

I've got to say I love Chris Rock. Sure he says stupid offensive things sometimes, but he says stupid and offensive things about everyone, not just white people. When it comes to racism I think his skit The Niggar Family is a great exploration of how many people you can offend while making them piss themselves laughing.
That's one thing I always loved about Bill Hicks, too--he would piss everyone off, but it was soooo funny. The thing about Chris Rock is that it didn't offend me that he's ragging on white people--it pissed me off that he had no idea that most (possibly even all, but I can't be positive) Africans are lactose intolerant. Like I said, the peanut allergy would have been better or something, and he is really pretty funny. I have forgiven him his past transgressions.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

About Me

GinBaby
United States
Just sittin here pretendin I know shit.

My Groups

Neighborhood

Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.

Archives

Bye, Bush